The application

Here is the application provided to NRP by Councillor Hume.  This particular application sent to the Committee of Adjustments may be routine and not be something to be concerned with, but we are still double double checking.

Councillor Hume wrote to NRP on June 1st and provided some clarity:”… the entire site is still governed by the agreed site plan and the zoning on the site remains. In order to proceed with the development, in accordance with the zoning and the site plan, the property needs to be severed and the only way to do that is by request to the Committee of Adjustment for consent to subdivide. They are not proposing to vary any of the conditions that are contained in the site plan or in any way varying the zoning by-law.

Regardless of the number of parcels the global site plan agreement and the zoning by-law are the overriding documents – they must conform to the bylaw and the agreement.

In reading the notice they are not requesting any changes to the zoning or site plan. … in Ottawa the Committee of Adjustment has the following powers:

  • hear Applications for “Minor Variances” – where a requirement of a Zoning By-law cannot be met (under Section 45 of the Planning Act)
  • hear Applications for Consent to “Sever” a property or for any agreement, mortgage or lease that extends for more than 21 years (under Section 53 of the Planning Act)
  • consider Applications for Permission, which deal with the enlargement or extension of a building or structure that is legally non-conforming, or for a change in non-conforming use
  • review Applications for Validation of Title and Power of Sale.”

Leave a comment »

Notice from City of Ottawa

Leave a comment »

Notice of public hearing – Wednesday, June 16, 2010 @ 1 pm

A notice was put up on Playfair Drive announcing that a public hearing would be held on Wednesday, June 16, 2010 @ 1 pm at Ben Franklin Place.  As NoRezone has yet to receive a copy of the written notice, we will do our very best to get it and post it asap.

The full text reads as follows:

Committee of Adjustment – Notice of Public Hearing

File Nos. D08-01-10/B-00189 to D08-01-10/B-00191

To consider Applications for Consent to subdivide the property into three separate parcels of land in order to further develop the property

Re: 1695 Playfair Drive & 1701, (1683) Kilborn Avenue

will be heard on Wednesday, June 16, 2010, starting at 1:00 p.m., Ben Franklin Place, The Chamber, Main Floor, 101 Centrepointe Drive, Ottawa

Additional information is available by calling 580-2436 or by visiting the Office of the Committee, between 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Monday to Friday at 101 Centrepointe Drive, Ottawa, ON K2G 5K7.

To obtain a copy of the written notice, please submit your request in writing.

Leave a comment »

All quiet

There is no new information to provide to the community, but I thought it was about time for a quick post. I have received numerous inquiries on the status of the redevelopment and my answer is always the same: wait and see. As this is a long process, please be patient and I will keep you posted when something (anything!) is brought to my attention. On that note, if you are aware of any new information, please feel free to share it with me in order for it to be posted to the masses.

Thanks and have a nice summer!

Leave a comment »

Status quo

Hi all.  Long time between posts, but that is because there is very little that NRP has been involved in with the current proposal over the last few months.

Since the most recent draft proposal was presented by the developer to the City of Ottawa, comments from all neighbourhood groups have been submitted and we wait, we wait, we wait to hear the next step in the process.

When we know, you’ll know.

Hang in there!

Leave a comment »

Productive meeting

Yesterday, NRP attended a meeting hosted by Councillor Peter Hume.  In attendance were representatives from the other 3 neighbourhood groups: Rosewood Estates, Protect Vista on the Park and CCC500, as well as John Smit of the City of Ottawa.  Ted Fobert of Fotenn Planning & Urban Design was present to provide an independent urban planner perspective.

The meeting was arranaged to review the most recent proposal (here and here) by the developer that was prepared in consultation with the City of Ottawa, Councillor Hume’s office and an independent urban planner brought in by the City of Ottawa.  The meeting’s goal was to provide an opportunity for comments that the City of Ottawa and Councillor Hume could then use as possible conditions for the developer to agree to in order to receive approval.

Significant changes to the previous proposals from the developer include:

1. The removal altogether of Building E on Playfair Drive.  Building D (off of Playfair and parallel to 1701 Kilborn Avenue) is to be a graduated 5 storey building with 36 units. 

2. The attempt to provide greenspace behind 1695 Playfair Drive with the removal of above ground parking.  The proposal seems to present a hybrid parking system with most of it below the surface, but with some kind of a roof that will allow greenspace and garden plots above.  This design remains a bit confusing to all without 3D photos.

3. The existing towers (1695 Playfair and 1701 Kilborn) will be retrofitted in a manner more consistent with providing a more open space.

4. Traffic – The underground parking setup will divide the volume of traffic appropriately between Playfair and Kilborn.

Based on comments at the meeting, issues that still need to be resolved include:

1. Future Development – In the new proposal, the developer has left the words “Future Building Site” where proposed Building E used to be.  There was unanimous unease with the idea that the developer may conduct future development on this site and/or the site behind 1695 Playfair Drive at a later stage.

2. Building C -  Though the developer is legally entitled to build a 45 metre (14 storey) building, there remain concerns about the look-feel of the proposed building (sculpting, terraces) and the privacy issues to the West facing side (looking onto Rosewood Estates).

3. Garbage / Moving - The issue of where the loading zones will be placed for moving trucks, the garbage and the recycling for Buildings A, B, C and D remains unclear.

4. Parking off of Playfair Drive – CCC500/Protect Vista on the Park have confirmed that there is a legal issue that they will need to raise independently with the developer with respect to the above ground parking areas that are in place off of the Playfair Drive entrance.

5. Alternate vehicle access to CCC500 from Playfair Drive.

6. Timing of improvements – could priority be given to retrofitting Buildings A and B before the construction of Buildings C and D?

7. Proper landscaping.

8. Blending of the project to the neighbourhood and to the existing Buildings A and B.

Any additional comments are to be provided to Councillor Hume’s office by Friday, August 14th.  If you have any comments, please pass them on to NRP via the website or at norezoneplayfair@gmail.com in order for us to bundle the community’s comments together in one tidy package.

A big thank you to Councillor Hume and his staff (Anne Ménard and Susan Scott) for putting together the meeting!

Comments (1) »

Next step

NRP has been invited to meet with Councillor Hume and the other community groups in early August 2009 to view and discuss the latest proposal by the developer.   NRP is looking forward to seeing an advance copy of the proposal prior to the meeting.

We’ll keep you posted on any and all developments!

Leave a comment »

NRP’s comments to the City of Ottawa

Here are NRP’s comments to the City of Ottawa with respect to the site plan controll proposal for 1701 Kilborn Avenue.

Leave a comment »

That was fast

Site Plan Control Proposal signThe old zoning by-law application notice sign has been replaced with the new Site Plan Control Proposal sign.

Leave a comment »

IMPORTANT: Notice of Site Plan Control Application

As anticipated, the developer has provided a Site Plan Control Application to the City of Ottawa.  All the info that we have received from the City of Ottawa is below.

We will keep you posted on next steps and NoRezone’s position to the application in the coming days.  A very quick glance at the application document shows minimal changes (i.e. 18 storeys to 15 storeys) by the developer from their original zoning by-law amendment application of April 2008.

————————————————————————————

Dear Sir/Madam:

Please be advised that the Planning & Growth Management Branch has received a Site Plan Control application for 1701 Kilborn Avenue.  Details of the applicant’s request are outlined below.

Site Location:

The subject site, which is irregular in shape, and is located on the northwest corner of Kilborn Avenue and Playfair Drive. 

Description of Site and Surroundings:

A 14-storey, 209-unit apartment building, known municipally as 1701 Kilborn Avenue, is located at the southeast corner of the property.  Parking for this apartment building is located to the north of the building and is accessed by a vehicular entrance located along an existing right-of-way over the abutting property to the north and accessed by Playfair Drive. 

A 15-storey, 224-unit apartment building, known municipally as 1695 Playfair Drive, occupies the northwest quadrant of the site.  A two-storey above ground parking garage, which is accessed from Kilborn Avenue, is located on the western portion of the site, to the south of the apartment building. 

A15-storey, 190 units apartment building and NCC lands abut the property to the north.  Low-density single detached houses are located to the east of the subject site, across Playfair Drive.  Row dwellings are located immediately to the west of the subject site and a mix of single detached dwellings and row dwellings are located to the south, across Kilborn Avenue.

Purpose of Site Plan Control Proposal:
The purpose of the Site Plan Control Application is to allow for the construction of two apartment buildings on the subject property.

Proposal Details:
The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing above-grade parking garage and construct a new 15-storey, 148-unit apartment building.  The height of the proposed apartment building is approximately 45 metres as permitted by the Zoning By-law. A three level below-grade parking garage, comprised of 372 parking spaces, will be constructed immediately below the proposed building and will be accessed from Kilborn Avenue.   In addition, the applicant is proposing to demolish the existing pool building, located at the rear of 1701 Kilborn Avenue, to construct four-storey, 39-unit apartment building.  The height of the proposed building will be approximately 12 metres. Parking for the low-rise apartment building will be accommodated within the existing parking garage currently associated with 1701 Kilborn Avenue.  Vehicular entrance to the existing parking garage will be relocated closer to the Playfair / Kilborn Avenue intersection. A vehicular drop-off/pick-up area is being proposed at the corner of Playfair Avenue and the existing right-of-way, in front of the proposed 15-storey apartment building, and in front of 1701 Kilborn Avenue.

Other revisions to the site include the establishment of 116 surface parking spaces at the rear of 1695 Playfair Drive.  A total of 671 parking spaces will be provided on-site, 39 of which will be visitor parking.  An additional 32 visitor parking spaces will be located on the existing right-of-way located to the north of the pool building.       

Landscaping is proposed throughout the subject site.  The proposal includes a reflective/skating pond immediately to the north of 1701 Kilborn Avenue and a landscape buffer along northwest and west property lines, adjacent to Rosewood Estates.ose 

 

Julie Sarazin
Planner, Central Division
Infrastructure Services and Community Sustainability Department
Planning and Growth Management Branch
110 Laurier Avenue West, 4th Floor Ottawa, K1P 1J1

Tel: (613) 580-2424 ext. 13872
Fax: (613) 560-6006

Leave a comment »

Slideshow

Enjoy the 2 minute slideshow that was done by Julia Kent, a Carleton University journalism student, about the proposed development of 1701 Kilborn Avenue and our neighbourhood’s efforts. The slideshow was part of Julia’s term project.

Make sure you turn on the “CAPTIONS” at the bottom of the slide show before watching it:  http://www.webng.com/kentjulia/

Leave a comment »

Update from Councillor Hume – January 2009

Happy New Year to all!

In this month’s VISTAS, Councillor Hume provides this update (http://www.peterhume.ca/playfair_towers.html) on the proposed Playfair Towers development. There is nothing new to report since the developer withdrew the original zoning by-law application.

Here it is in full from Councillor Hume’s website:

Playfair Towers
January 2009 Update

I am pleased to advise you that Playfair Residents Limited has withdrawn their zoning application. They have agreed that any new development on the Playfair property will have to respect the existing zoning on the site.

I understand that the owner will soon be bringing forward a site plan application that will propose a development that respects the existing zoning. The zoning outlines what is permissible to build on a particular site and a site plan details how the site will be developed. A site plan deals with all of fine details of a development such as access, grading, loading zones, landscaping, locations of parking, urban design and other detail features of any proposed development.

One of the most important parts of a site plan is the urban design aspect. As I am sure you are aware both the City Planners and the local community felt that the design of both the tower and the town homes, in the former proposal, did not integrate, from a design standpoint, with the adjacent community. City planning staff will be reviewing any proposed site plan to ensure that the design integrates well with the existing community.

In my last update to you I outlined a consensus position with myself, city staff and the local community. A site plan is where we implement the consensus position. Therefore, any new site plan will have to contain the following:

Underground resident parking.
Limited traffic access off of Playfair Drive by segmenting the garage and reducing parking access off of Playfair.
Maximize visitor parking spots.
Provision of adequate parking for residents similar to parking at the condo at 1705 Playfair Drive.
Provision of fencing, appropriate to the site to delineate Carleton Condominium Corporation # 500 property from the rest of the site.
Construction of a new entrance for Carleton Condominium Corporation # 500 off of Playfair Drive that provides a more appropriate and distinctive entrance for Carleton Condominium Corporation # 500.
Once we have received a site plan we will be meeting with the individuals and groups representing those most closely affected by the application to develop a consensus position. They include NoRezone, the Board of Directors of the Carleton Condominium Corporation (CCC) #500, the Board of Directors of Rosewood Estates and Protect Vista on the Park.

Leave a comment »

Happy Holidays

Happy Holidays to all and a very happy new year.

Thank you for all your support over the last 8 months.

Leave a comment »

Rezoning application withdrawn – December 5, 2008

Mr. Bierbrier, Mr. McGuinty:

 

I am pleased to send you the letter below on behalf of Councillor Peter Hume.

 

As you will see, the Regional Group of Companies has withdrawn its rezoning application at Kilborn and Playfair.

 

Their intention is to return to the City with a revised site plan application before the year’s end.

 

We will be in touch with you again at that time.

 

Until then, please do not hesitate to contact our office if we may be of assistance to you.

 

Kind regards,

 

Anne Ménard

Executive Assistant | Adjointe Principale

Councillor Peter Hume’s Office | Cabinet du conseiller Peter Hume

City of Ottawa | Ville d’Ottawa

110 Laurier Avenue West | Ottawa, Ontario, K1P 1J1 | T 613.580.2488 ext 28970

 

 

—–Original Message—–

 

Subject: RE: Playfair

 

December 5, 2008

 

 

City of Ottawa

Department of Planning

Transit and the Environment

110 Laurier Avenue West

Ottawa ON K1P 1J1

Attention: Mr. Grant Lindsay

 

Re:      Playfair Towers rezoning application -Request to withdraw application

            1701 Kilborn Avenue and 1695 Playfair Drive

 

I am writing to you on behalf of our client, Playfair Residences Limited, who has instructed me to withdraw the application for the rezoning of the Playfair Towers property at 1701 Kilborn Avenue and 1695 Playfair Drive, effective immediately.

 

Please consider this application to be withdrawn and please arrange for the refund of any application fees that may be applicable.

 

Thank you for the time and effort that you and your staff have put into this application.

 

 

Yours truly,

Lloyd Phillips & Associates Ltd.

 

Lloyd Phillips MCIP RPP AICP

 

c.c.      Mr. Steve Gordon, Regional Group of Companies

             Councillor Peter Hume

Leave a comment »

EMC article dated November 21, 2008

The Playfair development was in the news again this week in the November 21, 2008 edition of EMC.

Leave a comment »

More intensification called for in new urban plan

Jake Rupert
The Ottawa Citizen

http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=8e06c527-f6d1-4640-9227-3b15594253a2

OTTAWA – If you want to keep future municipal property-tax increases low, you had better embrace the principles of a more compact, transit-based city contained in an update of Ottawa’s official land-use plan, says the chair of city council’s planning committee.

On Monday, the update recommendations will be tabled at a meeting of Alta Vista Councillor Peter Hume’s committee.

They represent a continuation of the municipality’s drive to create a more dense, financially and environmentally sustainable city built around public transit use instead of roads and cars.

Mr. Hume says accommodating more residential and commercial growth in existing areas means the city won’t have to spend tax money building and maintaining new infrastructure.

“Using the capacity of infrastructure already made with taxpayer investments, intensifying, is the best way to keep tax increases down in the future,” he said.

The recommendations call for slower urban sprawl and increased population density throughout the city, particularly along public-transit lines in existing neighbourhoods. They also seek more protection for farmland, building up of rural villages, and protecting environmentally significant lands.

The proposed changes come after a round of public consultation on a number of issues and are already being challenged by development companies.

City planners say an aging population and an increased interest in smaller-scale living, especially in downtown condos, means less demand for single, detached homes in the suburbs that create sprawl. Because of this, city staff say the urban boundary, outside of which large-scale residential building isn’t supposed to take place, only needs to expand by 850 hectares over the next 20 years.

The development companies say this a 1,500-hectare expansion of the boundary is needed to accommodate future demand for single, detached homes.

Another sticking point is expected to be intensification targets for new developments in existing neighbourhoods. Currently, about 36 per cent of all new residential units being built in the city are created within areas already served by city roads, sewers, water mains, community centres, fire stations and other city infrastructure.

The rest of the new construction is in new areas that require new services. Much of the cost of building this infrastructure is covered by development charges the city collects from builders, but the cost of operating and maintaining the infrastructure is not recouped through an expanded tax base. This leaves increased operating costs as the No. 1 driver of property-tax increases.

City planners recommend that over the next 20 years the percentage of new construction inside existing service areas rise to 44 per cent, and that all construction projects in newly developing districts have higher densities than in the past. They also want more commercial development in areas with existing roads and services.

The last time the city passed an official plan was 2003, and the revamp is mandated by provincial legislation. The land-use recommendations were done in conjunction with a new 22-year, $7.2-billion transportation infrastructure spending plan for the city, including a proposed new light-rail-based transit system. The official plan recommendations are designed to greatly increase the number of people living and working close to the transit system and to limit the need for expensive new roads and widenings of existing ones.

Nancy Schepers, the deputy city manager for sustainability and planning, said the environmental and financial arguments for a more compact city are irrefutable and it’s time for the city to embrace what is known as “smart growth.”

She, too, said intensification projects, as opposed to construction in new areas, will help ease the burden on property taxpayers.

“Using the existing infrastructure to service new areas is money saved, and it’s money you can use for other things,” she said.

She said public consultations have shown people understand this and agree with the goals of the city when it comes to increasing transit use and densifying existing neighbourhoods. However, she said, when it comes to their own neighbourhoods, people are often opposed to projects that would achieve these goals. Mr. Hume said changes in provincial law give municipalities much greater control over proposed building plans, and that the proposed changes to the official plan incorporate these. He said he hopes this will lead to better architecture and urban plans for projects that fit in with existing communities, and lessen public opposition to intensification.

“There’s going to be a real focus on intensification, and the revamp adds some significant tools to our toolbox to make it happen and make it happen in a way that produces better urban design, better streetscapes, and better architecture,” Mr. Hume said. “There’s good solid financial and environmental reasons for these changes.”

After the recommendations are tabled at the planning committee and the rural affairs committee, they will go out for public consultations and return to council in the new year for further refinements. If things go according to schedule, city council will be approving the revamped official land-use plan in April.

URL for the city document:
http://ottawa.ca/calendar/ottawa/citycouncil/pec/2008/11-24/ACS2008-ICS-PLA-0231.htm

Leave a comment »

The waiting game

Many of you have asked recently “what is the next step?”.  Well, we are waiting, waiting, waiting patiently for the developer’s revised proposal. 

When we have it, you’ll have it. Guaranteed.

Leave a comment »

VISTAS – November 2008 updates from NoRezone and Councillor Hume

In the November 2008 edition of the VISTAS, you will find 2 articles regarding the 1701 Kilborn Avenue proposed development.  On page 7, you will find an update from NoRezone and on page 22, Councillor Hume has provided an update to the community.

As you can tell from the two updates, we are all awaiting the developer’s revised plans.

Leave a comment »

Approved plan for hospital lands ‘something out of the ’50′s’: councillor

Committee sanctions mix of businesses, condo towers, park, but transit still issue

 

Patrick Dare

The Ottawa Citizen


Wednesday, October 29, 2008

 

A new development plan for the hospital lands at Smyth Road and Alta Vista Drive is being touted as an effort to create a more mixed community, with residential buildings constructed along with more hospital buildings. But one city councillor says the plan approved at committee yesterday is old-style suburban development.

The plan, which involves land bordered by Riverside Drive in the west, Smyth Road to the south, Russell Road in the east and the Alta Vista transportation corridor to the north, allows for the future expansion of The Ottawa Hospital.

The Smyth Road health sciences campus in the study area, which covers about 150 acres, includes the General campus of The Ottawa Hospital, the Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, the Rehabilitation Centre, the Health Sciences Building and the Alta Vista campus of the University of Ottawa.

A large part of the property, on the western side of the study area, is the federal government’s National Defence Medical Centre, which is no longer being used as a hospital and will likely become available to the Ontario government in 2013.

The City of Ottawa began the study of this land in 2004, with a view to having a better mix of development, rather than just another tract of housing.

The plan approved yesterday by the planning and environment committee includes three apartment or condominium towers of 10 to 12 storeys and townhouses, as well as a square of streets to be lined with businesses, surrounding a five-acre park.

The town centre is meant to give a focus to the community for the new residents of the neighbourhood and several thousand workers in the nearby health science buildings.

The plan also includes road access from Alta Vista Drive and two roundabouts to handle traffic.

Capital Ward Councillor Clive Doucet said the plan is not so much a development plan as it is a road plan.

This development envisions roads built in the near term, but also lays the groundwork for construction of the Alta Vista Parkway, a proposed roadway from Conroy Road, through the hospital lands and then downtown, he said.

That road, much protested by Alta Vista residents, is still on the books, though it is considered a long-term project for the city. The more immediate roadwork would simply link Riverside Drive to the new hospital development.

“Here we are in 2008, planning for something out of the 1950s,” said Mr. Doucet. He said that while patients are taken to hospitals by car or ambulance, the great majority of people at such a health sciences campus are working there and should be travelling by modern public transit.

However, Alta Vista Councillor Peter Hume, who is chairman of the planning committee, said the plan has strong support from surrounding neighbourhoods because the community association presidents all sat on the steering committee that oversaw the planning exercise. Mr. Hume has acknowledged the poor transportation links into the health sciences campus and he notes that the road plans for the area include better links to the transit system.

Mr. Hume said if the transportation work for the hospital lands doesn’t get done, then the development won’t be permitted by the city.

Planning committee members approved rezoning several pieces of land for the future development. Mr. Hume said he will have letters of support for the hospital lands plan from community association and hospital leaders in time for the city council vote on the matter Nov. 12.

http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/city/story.html?id=263439ce-47c8-4212-8e67-570b80b91a69

 

Comments (2) »

Small victory in Old Ottawa South

Builder bumps up size of new townhomes, but makes cosmetic changes to please critics

 

Maria Cook

The Ottawa Citizen


Monday, October 27, 2008

 

Residents of Old Ottawa South have won some concessions from a developer in the form of cosmetic changes to the design of two massive townhouses set to replace a 1,200-square-foot house.

However, the changes by Campanale Homes do not address neighbours’ central concern — the sheer size of the buildings. At a total of 6,752 square feet, they are more than five times the size of the existing house at 35 Brighton Ave.

Demolition of the house, which faces the Rideau River and Brighton Beach Park, is expected to take place today.

“While opinion is divided, a number of people have remarked that the updated design is improved,” next-door neighbour Kristen Ostling says.

“The support of the community and over 400 signatures on our petition were no doubt instrumental in bringing about changes to the design.”

Instead of making the three-storey, semi-detached houses smaller, the revised design actually makes them bigger. “We were hoping it would go down in size,” says Ms. Ostling. “It’s the absolute opposite.”

The 60-by-81-foot lot is zoned for a double and was purchased for $540,000. No rezoning or variance was required.

The City of Ottawa has recently done away with “floor space index,” a zoning provision that sets a limit on building area, and now relies on the setbacks from property lines and height limits — a change that generally allows bigger buildings.

“There is no law that says you can’t build a monster home,” says Councillor Clive Doucet, who represents the area and helped negotiate the design changes.

Currently, he says, the term “intensification” is “not much more than a licence for spot rezoning.”

In future, there may be hope for Ottawa residents concerned about inappropriate and over-scaled development.

Community design plans “will become an important tool for controlling esthetics, size and height,” Mr. Doucet says. “They are a detailed response to the Official Plan’s requirements for intensification.”

About a dozen community design plans have been completed so far, and Mr. Doucet estimates there could eventually be at least 100. Old Ottawa South begins working on its plan next year.

“The community is going to be exercising much more control over the landscape. We’re hoping it will become the vehicle that will bring quality control to intensification.”

But, says Mr. Doucet, the vision of communities is not always aligned with that of city hall.

“The city doesn’t want this to happen,” he says, noting that city officials have not yet approved Westboro’s community design plan because it “puts teeth in the height limits.”

In Ottawa East, “the city doesn’t want to see main streets limited to four or five storeys. There’s a power struggle going on.”

In Ottawa South, a group of neighbours held two meetings in June and July with developers Rocco and Vince Campanale. The Citizen was unable to reach them for comment.

Concerned that the proposed development did not fit the scale and character of the area, the neighbours noted that two double garages dominate the ground level.

The city’s urban design guidelines for infill housing state: “A garage should not dominate any façade facing a street, public space or other residential dwelling.”

Asphalt parking for four cars eliminates virtually all of the front garden and the second- and third-storey balconies over the garage create a cold, high-rise-like façade, they said.

In contrast to the design’s more than 6,000 square feet, one of the largest houses on the street is 3,000 square feet on a lot of the same size. “It resembles tract housing in the suburbs,” says Ms. Ostling.

The revised design borrows stylistic details from the neighbourhood. It adds decorative gables to the roof and eliminates the balcony on the third floor. It is now enclosed, making each house 143-square-feet larger. The entrance seems wider, and there is a small gabled roof over the front porch. The garage doors now have windows.

“I think the changes are good,” says Mr. Doucet. “They made it more friendly and less intrusive.”

The price has gone up, too. At 3,133 square feet each, they were just under $1 million. At, 3,376 square feet, they are advertised at $1,195,000.

The front is still mostly asphalt and the garage doors remain the same.

Ms. Ostling said many people are disappointed. Neighbours had suggested a smaller garage door that led to a same-sized interior or a stepped-back façade to lessen the bulky appearance.

“We hoped that they would come up with a much better design and even consider using an architect,” she said.

Still, Mr. Doucet says it’s unusual for developers to agree to make changes when they don’t have to. “Nor do (developers) normally meet one-on-one with the neighbours and city councillor. This is the only time I can think this has happened.

“Campanale is one of our best developers,” he adds. “They are very respectful of the zoning.”

The developer describes the houses as “nestled on a quiet street in a preferred neighbourhood.” Features include an elevator and “over-sized balconies with glass panels to enjoy the river views.”

In a letter to Campanale Homes, the residents had said their area is defined by “welcoming entranceways, front gardens, front porches and mature trees lining the street.”

“Communities are saying intensification is OK, but you’ve got to do it in a way that increases the quality of life, and doesn’t decrease it,” says Mr. Doucet.

http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/city/story.html?id=fd58bceb-e2c2-4851-87dc-a5fd89b8ab46

 

Leave a comment »

VOTE locally, think municipally!

You voted (hopefully you voted) on Tuesday.

Now don’t forget to VOTE on the 1701 Kilborn development proposal. It’s as simple as 1,2,3:

1. Click on the link to the October 2008 Open Letter (top right hand corner)

2. Print/Save/Forward to 100 friends/family/neighbours/emails

3. Send the Open Letter to Councillor Hume, the City of Ottawa and the developer with your comments.

EVERY VOTE COUNTS!!!

[this blog posting was approved by NoRezone Playfair and its effort to produce logicial, intelligent and proportional infill in Alta Vista]

Leave a comment »

Letter from Councillor Hume to NoRezone

Sorry for the delay – I was not at my computer this long weekend. 

Here is the response from Councillor Peter Hume regarding the Open Letter campaign.

Leave a comment »

PLAY FAIR! Open Letter for distribution – deadline Friday, October 17, 2008

Dear Alta Vista neighbours,
 
Please find attached the next step in the NO REZONE PLAYFAIR campaign:
 
NO REZONE PLAYFAIR challenges the developer of 1701 Kilborn to PLAY FAIR!
 
We would ask that you print it out, forward it to neighbours and other concerned members of Alta Vista and ensure that signed copies are sent back to Councillor Hume, the City of Ottawa and the developer by FRIDAY, OCTOBER 17, 2008.  Hard copies can be picked up at McGuinty Law Office (1801 Kilborn) in packages of 100 for distribution.  Feel free to pick up, complete and drop off YOUR letter at McGuinty Law Office – we will make sure that your comments make it to Councillor Hume, the City of Ottawa and the developer ASAP.  Arrangements can also be made for hard copies by contacting norezoneplayfair@gmail.com.
 
Our goal is a minimum of 1,000 letters.  Let’s do it together!
 
Thanks,
 
Steve Bierbrier
norezoneplayfair@gmail.com
www.norezone.wordpress.com

Leave a comment »

An equal opportunity developer

Developer’s highrise plans rile west side neighbours

 

Tim Shufelt

The Ottawa Citizen


Friday, October 03, 2008

 

OTTAWA – Angry residents opposed to a highrise residential development that vastly exceeds the current zoning restrictions on the west side packed a high school auditorium last night and took their frustrations out on representatives of the developer and property manager.

Ottawa-based property manager Regional Group presented drawings and specifics for a plan to construct a 537-unit development, featuring a 20-storey tower on Baseline Road and Draper Avenue.

The developer already has an application before the city to rezone the site, which is currently zoned for only low-rise developments with a maximum height of 11 metres.

The project also includes two 14-storey apartment buildings and a series of stacked townhouses.

Residents at times shouted down the presenters and said the main tower would be the tallest structure in the neighbourhood.

It would also create a significant shadow effect, would exacerbate existing traffic and parking problems and would drive property values down, they said.

Byron Holland, who bought a house in the area a couple of months ago, said the project would dramatically and fundamentally change the neighbourhood.

“We, as a neighbourhood and a community, bought into this community because of what it is,” he said. “This is so far out of character that it is simply a non-sensical development in this area.”

http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=8dbfd97b-a722-4aa3-9794-1c96ae091d25

           

Leave a comment »

6 months later and (still) 18 storeys strong *

As summer turns to fall, you start to lose track of time and realize that we have been knee deep in this development process for over six (6!!) months.  Quite incredible how much time and energy this endeavour has taken up with residents of Alta Vista.  What were we doing before this issue came up?  Probably having far more fun than this.

 

On Tuesday, September 23, 2008, Dylan and I (your NO REZONE PLAYFAIR chairs) arranged for an informal meeting at the Ottawa Mennonite Church at 1830 Kilborn Avenue of Alta Vista residents who represent neighbourhood areas that will have a direct geographic impact in this redevelopment proposal.  The meeting was VERY well attended.

 

Ted Fobert, founding partner of Fotenn Consultants Inc. was the guest speaker.  NO REZONE retained Mr. Fobert in late spring 2008 to provide an unbiased opinion of the proposed development from an urban planning perspective.  Mr. Fobert provided the meeting with an overview of what has taken place over the last 6 months and what the next steps are in the process, including the fact that during informal discussions, the developer (through his local team at Lloyd Phillips) is allegedly prepared to provide the following concessions:

 

Remove all the proposed above-ground parking behind 1695 Playfair Drive (the tennis court area backing onto Rosewood Estates) and replace it with underground parking (realizing that reduced greenspace does not go over well with the City);

  • Provide a setup that would have 80% of the traffic flow onto Kilborn Avenue, with only 20% coming out of Playfair Drive (an actual concession);
  • Provide more visitor parking than the minimum required by the City of Ottawa (basically, foregoing the rezoning proposal); and
  • Increase the setback of the 4-storey buildings, fronting on Playfair Drive, from 3 metres to 6 metres (basically foregoing the rezoning proposal);

 

18 Storeys

 

To-date, there has been no movement by the developer on the height of the proposed 18-storey building.  Almost all in attendance agreed that a height proposal less than 14 storeys is the starting point of the discussion with the City of Ottawa.  Rosewood Estates however is prepared to fight any height increase at the site of the current 2-storey above ground garage.

 

Zoning bylaw amendment versus Comprehensive Zoning Bylaw

 

To-date, there has been no movement by the developer on cancelling its zoning by-law amendment (the one it made to the City in spring 2008) and making its proposal under the comprehensive zoning by-law (in force shortly).  Is the developer sticking with the request to increase density (but not height) or is the developer planning on flip-flopping and only going to ask for a variance to the height (but not the density)?  Only the developer knows.

 

Density

 

To-date, the developer has not backed off from its plan to increase the density of the lot from FSI 1.5 to FSI 2.5 even though the area appears from a layman’s eyes to be dense enough as it is right now.

 

In NO REZONE’s opinion, the proposed 18-storey building:

  • goes well beyond acceptable urban planning design for the neighbourhood;
  • design and orientation will have negative impacts to sunlight and sightlines; and
  • will tower over the Rosewood Estates bungalows.

 

In NO REZONE’s opinion, the proposed 18-storey building:

  • goes well beyond acceptable urban planning design for the neighbourhood;
  • design and orientation will have negative impacts to sunlight and sightlines; and
  • will tower over the Rosewood Estates bungalows.

 

So, what can YOU do now?

 

Well, NO REZONE PLAYFAIR will shortly launch an open letter to the City of Ottawa, Councillor Hume and the developer where WE CHALLENGE THE DEVELOPER TO PLAY FAIR!

 

Our goal is to have at least 1,000 letters sent out to Councillor Hume, the City of Ottawa and the developer within 14 days of the launch.  The emphasis is on you to forward/pick up/drop off the message and distribute it to at least 100 Alta Vista residents AND then get it sent out to the City, Hume and the developer.

 

Remember that NO REZONE is not opposed to intensification, but it must be logical, intelligent and proportional intensification.

 

 

 

(* for complete transparency, the notes from this meeting were provided to me by neighbour Ewan Evans and I have added a little extra spice to it)

Join our mailing list!  Just send us an email to norezoneplayfair@gmail.com

Leave a comment »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.